On Jul 29, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-i...@mit.edu> wrote: > > I like your text below except that signing is the wrong word. > How about generation of integrity-protected messages?
Yeah, that's what I meant.. New text WFM, thanks [again] Sam for addressing these concerns! -danny > These messages are almost never digitally signed. > Proposed text: > >> Routers need to >> have tight enough time synchronization that receivers permit a key >> to be utilized for validation prior to the first use of that key for >> signing or >> availability will be impacted. >
