is there a reason to not disclose who the individual participant is? Scott
On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to make > the following status changes: > > - RFC2050 from Best Current Practice to Historic > > The supporting document for this request can be found here: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-2050-to-historic/ > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-08-07. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The affected document can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2050/ > > IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-2050-to-historic/ballot/ > >
