On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hal...@gmail.com> wrote: > I DO NOT agree that 2119 is the only source of consequence here.
Sorry. RFCs are not written in English, they are written in RFCish, a language based in English but with modifications (specified in RFCs). 2119 overrides anything you might think you know about what words mean.
