On May 29, 2013, at 11:53 PM, Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> I can also see potential for adding some info to the Tao, but the danger
> there is that document becomes too big and too detailed to be of use.
Many would claim it already is. We discussed that here a few years ago, and
informally decided "too long" was better than "too short and with a lot of
pointers to other documents that needed to be read".
> Is this a tutorial?
Mainly. To quote...
NOTE: This draft is intentionally non-normative. It is meant as a
guide to common practice, rather than as a formal definition of
what is permissible.
Proposal: maybe don't do this as an Internet Draft, but do it as a tutorial.
--Paul Hoffman
