On May 29, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> On 5/29/2013 7:31 PM, Joe Touch wrote: >> This doc seems more useful as a section of an update to the TAO of the >> IETF. I agree with Brian that putting it forth as a separate document >> may give the unintended impression that this is the formal procedure. > > > Nevermind that it isn't standards track or BCP and that it says quite > explicitly that it isn't normative? > > Just the mere fact that it's a "separate" document will somehow impart and > implication of official normativeness? Yes. We even have that problem with the Tao itself. --Paul Hoffman
