On 5/23/13 5:34 PM, Juliao Braga wrote: > Currently there are three. How many? To twelve meetings per year, for > example!
Sounds like a sure-fire way to shift the participation from skewing towards working engineers to skewing towards professional standardizers. How can we encourage people from underrepresented areas to 1) submit internet drafts, 2) review working group drafts, and 3) participate in mailing list discussions? Melinda
