This dude's ready to ship. Thanks for addressing my earlier comments. Barry
On Friday, April 12, 2013, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status > Section' > <draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> as Experimental RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org <javascript:;> mailing lists by 2013-05-10. Exceptionally, > comments may be > sent to i...@ietf.org <javascript:;> instead. In either case, please > retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document describes a simple process that allows authors of > Internet-Drafts to record the status of known implementations by > including an Implementation Status section. This will allow > reviewers and working groups to assign due consideration to documents > that have the benefit of running code, by considering the running > code as evidence of valuable experimentation and feedback that has > made the implemented protocols more mature. > > The process in this document is offered as an experiment. Authors of > Internet-Drafts are encouraged to consider using the process for > their documents, and working groups are invited to think about > applying the process to all of their protocol specifications. The > authors of this document intend to collate experiences with this > experiment and to report them to the community. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-running-code/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-running-code/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > >
