On 4/12/13 4:58 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> I just change the subject because I still beleive the problem with
> review is in the WG not IESG. Some WGs have few reviews on each WG
> document, that may not be bad, but I think having only one review or
> comment (excluding authors) within a WGLC is wrong in a WG review
> process. I think WG chair can find two participants to do it.
It seems plausible.
>
> I recommend WG's process to change their purpose so we have to get *two
> participants* which are not authors to review the work and comment
> within WGLC (even small text comment is ok). I recommend WG chairs to
> think about this proposal, if not then I will try write an I-D for this
> and communicate with community.
Possible we would need any how an I+D to change the process and mandate
this new review.
I haven't made my mind but it seems like a good idea.
>
> AB
Regards
as
