On 12/13/12 9:13 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > don't we already have a way of doing this? implementation reports, e.g. > > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt > > a wiki can be more easily curated, though has authorization challenges. > > could you clue me into how the different modes would facilitate progress > of the base document(s)?
The curation model is that somebody/somebodies take responsibility for authoring a document and tracking down implementations, writing them up, etc. The wiki model is that somebody/somebodies say "Hey! I've got an implementation, let me tell you about it." I don't see why they can't co-exist, but in the meantime I don't think implementation reports in the form of internet drafts are that common, and I'd be curious to see which is more effective at getting information out. What's the long-term plan for the RPKI implementation report - publication? Melinda
