Pete, Your Section 4 change looks fine to me, thanks.
The "monkey-in-the-middle" terminology is Randy's and I will defer to him. (I've added him to the To:) --John On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Pete McCann <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-09 > Reviewer: Peter McCann > Review Date: 2012-10-01 > IETF LC End Date: 2012-10-01 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > Section 4: > An "affected prefix" is any prefix that > was matched by a deleted or updated mapping, or could be matched by > an added mapping. > SHOULD BE: > An "affected prefix" is any prefix that > was matched by a deleted or updated mapping, or could be matched by > an added or updated mapping. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Abstract: > monkey-in-the-middle > That's a game of keep-away. Did you mean man-in-the-middle? Perhaps > this is a technical term that has been discussed on the mailing list. >
