Hi, On Apr 19, 2012, at 22:31, Adrian Farrel wrote: > The IESG has been discussing how to tidy up after Experimental RFCs. > > We have developed the following draft IESG statement. This does not > represent a change in process, and continues to value Experimental RFCs > as an important part of the IETF process. It does, however, seek to > encourage documentation of the conclusion of experiments.
any IESG statement would only cover Experimental RFCs on the IETF Stream, right? Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
