On 5 December 2011 04:27, Cameron Byrne wrote: [they = the IETF] >> they underscored that point by not rejecting various past attempts at >> expanding private ipv4 space like 240/4.
> Sorry. S/not rejecting/rejecting/ ACK. The last state I'm aware of is that the 240/4 addresses minus one were and still are (RFC 5735) reserved for IETF experiments, did I miss some newer IETF consensus about this? -Frank <http://omniplex.blogspot.com/2008/06/lost-found-268435455-free-ips.html> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
