Dear Jari, Am 03.11.2011 um 12:29 schrieb Jari Arkko:
> Ralph, > >> This document calls for the assignment of a new HIP Packet Type from the HIP >> Packet Type registry, >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/hip-parameters/hip-parameters.xml Assignment >> of HIP Packet Types requires IETF consensus. The purpose of this last call >> is to assess IETF consensus for the assignment described in the document. > > I support this action. > > RFC 5201 defines the rules for the registry. I would like to request that RFC > 5201bis http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-07#section-9 > would use "IETF Review or IESG Approval" rule as opposed to just saying "IETF > Review". I will make the change as requested. Best regards, Tobias -- Dipl.-Inform. Tobias Heer, Ph.D. Student Chair of Communication and Distributed Systems - comsys RWTH Aachen University, Germany tel: +49 241 80 207 76 web: http://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/team/tobias-heer/ blog: http://dtobi.wordpress.com/ card: http://card.ly/dtobi pgp id: AEECA5BF _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
