On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Andrew Feren wrote:
> On Fri 16 Sep 2011 03:22:08 PM EDT, Keith Moore wrote:
>> On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:07 PM, hector wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see these ass "Wikis" but basically "blog style" flat display of
>>> user comments, which I often do find useful, especially for the user ("this
>>> way") upon user ("not always") follow ups.
>>>
>>> A Wiki is more where you can change the main content and perhaps even the
>>> context. I don't think that is a good idea for RFCs.
>>
>> I'm thinking in terms of a hybrid Wiki where the RFC content is static but
>> the discussion is maintainable as a Wiki and can be visually associated with
>> the RFC content. You'd also want the RFC content to be clearly
>> distinguished from the discussion.
>>
>> Keith
>
> Something like the annotate POD feature for perl modules on CPAN?
>
> Example:
> Unannotated
> http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI-1.616/DBI.pm
>
> Annotated
> http://www.annocpan.org/~TIMB/DBI-1.616/DBI.pm
Yes, something like that.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
