On 8/24/11 2:23 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > On 8/24/2011 1:18 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> As long as a relatively large percentage of IETF folks see meetings as >> an opportunity to sight-see, I don't think we'll see much support for >> rotating among a small set of major hub locations. > > +1 > > But it's worse than "relatively large percent". There's absolutely no > minority constituency that is vocal about wanting this to change.
I'd be perfectly happy to rotate among the same 5 or 6 places all the time, but my motto is "dare to be dull". Plus I'm not sure how such a policy would work with sponsorships, because a number of recent sponsors presumably preferred the meeting to happen in their country for reasons of national pride or convenience. > That's why I declared myself giving up on this topic. Sure, one can tilt at a particular windmill for only so long... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
