On Aug 15, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > My experience is that a technical flaw, even if it is a corner case, is acted > upon by the WG. There are rare cases where the WG has lost energy, but in > general the WG wants to produce a quality output. As a result, technical > flaws are not the place where things get messy. Rather, things get messy > over issues that have a political component.
What's the difference between "issues that have a political component" and disagreements about whether there is a technical flaw? Seems to me that people who don't want to admit that there's a technical flaw (or who can't easily see it from their perspective) often dismiss the issue as a political problem. Keith
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
