On Jun 26, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, Joel Jaeggli writ > es: >> >> On Jun 25, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> >>> Not so odd. There are hundreds of millions of hosts out there that attempt >>> to use 6to4 by default, and (probably) thousands of relay routers that >>> attempt to support such users. Those boxes will be around for years, and a >> re >>> the target for the -advisory draft, regardless of the deprecation. >> >> the very fact that the devices are largely unmanaged, means that if you don' >> t want to break them worse then they already are that you have continue to s >> upport them until they age out of the network. > > And historic just told CISCO and Juniper to stop supporting 6to4 in their > big iron. The very boxes that need to remain to the end supporting 6to4 > because they are managed boxes.
I think this argument is somewhat orthogonal to the problem of supporting end-systems... However if your want to explore it, think the author is probably in a position to interpret the draft on behalf of his company. Juniper doesn't support 6to4 on the big iron. >> >>> Brian >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ietf mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
