On Jun 24, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> I've been reviewing the WGLC comments. I haven't finished doing so yet, >> but so far my impression is that the discussion was both thorough and >> well-organized. > > You might want to go further back in the archives than just the LC. There was > quite a bit of discussion on both drafts.
I've read some of it, and participated in some of the discussion for -advisory. Though my immediate question has been whether the WG really had rough consensus, and I don't think the other WG discussion matters too much in gauging that. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
