Bob - Would it be possible to get two additional version of this chart?
1) Including only those who were nomcom eligible (3 of 5 of the last meetings) at each meeting. 2) Including only those who were one of WG chair, document editor or author for a an active document at that meeting (e.g. WG met and there were active IDs), IESG/IAB Its unclear to me whether the raw numbers are actually useful as they tend to be fairly skewed by local attendees. That in itself isn't bad, but what I think what we're looking for are long-term contributors/collaborators. I know it may be difficult to assemble the above lists, but I believe the data does exist electronically. Thanks - Mike At 04:44 PM 8/6/2010, Bob Hinden wrote: >During my IAOC chair plenary talk at IETF78 (slides are in the proceedings) I >asked a question about continuing the current meeting policy (3 in North >America, 2 in Europe, 1 in Asia in two year period (3-2-1) ) or changing to a >1-1-1 policy based on current meeting attendance. The talk included a graph >of attendance by continent for IETF72-IETF78. I was asked to provide this >data to the community. > >It is attached. It includes the raw data and a new graph that shows >attendance by percentage. It appears to me that a 1-1-1 meeting policy is >justified by current overall IETF meeting attendance. > >Your comments are appreciated. > >Bob > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Ietf mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
