W.r.t. > All this is great stuff, but it all happened after the BOF, so > you can't reasonably claim that it represents BOF consensus. > And since BOFs are our primary mechanism for open, cross area > assessment for WG formation, I don't think it's accurate to suggest > that this is anywhere as near as open as actually having the > discussion in the BOF and gettting consensus, nor is it a substitute > for that. >
I do not think that forming a WG MANDATES a BOF. Several WGs have been formed (in the past) without a BOF. So pls do not depict a story as if a BOF is the only way how we reach consensus in IETF on teh question of forming a WG or not. Bert _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
