----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian Reschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom.Petch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ietf" <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 6:16 PM Subject: Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
> Tom.Petch wrote: > >> Hm, we are talking about XML namespace names, not DTD URIs. > >> > >> XML processors are not supposed to resolve them, so it seems strange to > >> insert requirements for clients that do so. > >> > > Welcome as this is, why is this I-D limited to XML namespace names? What about > > XML Schema names? > > Pardon my ignorance, but what is an XML Schema name? I > As defined in RFC3688, which sets up namespaces for XML namespaces XML schema XML rdfschema XML publicid all using the URI scheme urn: Tom Petch > > And is this not an update to RFC3688? > > I'd consider it an alternative approach. > > BR, Julian _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
