> --On Wednesday, 12 December, 2007 17:05 -0800 Ned Freed
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would prefer to have a reference to 2822upd, but I suspect
> > this decision dates back to when it wasn't clear that 2822bis
> > was going to get updated more or less at the same time.
> This is, of course, the sort of thing that can be changed in an
> RFC Editor note if, in fact, 2822 is ready and more or less
> concurrent.
That's what i was hoping you'd say - if 2822upd is ready such a change would be
a very good thing IMO.
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
