> > Not at all. There is a huge difference between "ask participants
> > in a discussion what they think" and a "consensus call".
> I've frequently seen postings that talk about the "consensus"
> of a Bar BoF, and never seen any objection to that terminology.
> Consensus is always qualified by the scope of the participants,
> and we all know how to tell the difference between "consensus
> of the IETF", "consensus of the room", "consensus of the working
> group", and "consensus of the participants in the mailing list X".
> I think the process discussion is a distraction from working
> on the actual issues, and wish it would stop.
+1
Ned
P.S. For the record, I think this document needs a bit of revising but
if that's done sensibly I fully support its publication.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
