John C Klensin wrote: > > --On Tuesday, 28 August, 2007 15:06 -0700 David Kessens > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thomas, >> >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:09:14PM -0400, Thomas Narten wrote: >>> We shouldn't be surprised that a "one size fits all" approach >>> (where home users get the same amount of space by default as >>> an IBM or Microsoft) doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to >>> some people. >> US 2001:49c0::/32 2001:49c0::/32 IBM-IPV6-01 >> US 2001:4898::/32 2001:4898::/32 MICROSOFT-IPV6-BLK >> >> If there really is a "one size fits all" policy, >> where can I get my personal IPv6 /32 allocation ? > > Conversely, if /48 is sufficient for any plausible enterprise, > is ARIN being appropriately conservative about addresses here?
Are you saying that from where you sit those organizations don't meet the requirements for an initial allocation as an LIR? _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
