"Randy Presuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > "Randy Presuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > (1) What be the point of an update to RFC 1345? A modern developer > > > should be going directly to the ISO and Unicode documents for > > > reference. > > > > RFC 1345 gives mnemonic strings for many useful characters, and there > > are a number of character input systems that use this standard for the > > purpose of standard key sequences for entering those characters. > ... > > RFC 1345 is *not* a standard. It is an informational RFC.
Duly noted. The issue remains that the informational RFC presents useful mnemonics for many characters, and there doesn't appear to be such a thing from Unicode or ISO. That's the point of an update to RFC 1345: it serves a purpose that I can't see served comparably well elsewhere. -- \ "I used to work in a fire hydrant factory. You couldn't park | `\ anywhere near the place." -- Steven Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
