Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> > > >> Fourth, lots of folks (me included) happen to find it > >> convenient to use NAT between my site/house/office and my > >> upstream provider. > Keith> do you also find it "convenient" that NAT has effectively > Keith> thwarted the deployment of huge numbers of new > Keith> applications, significantly raised the cost of deploying > Keith> others, and harmed the reliability of all applications? > > I find the tradeoffs work in favor of NAT; I expect this to be true > both for V4 and V6. > but how do you assign a value for those applications that cannot be run, especially given the diverse needs of the Internet community?
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
