On Aug 26, 2005, at 9:15 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 08:47:17AM -0400,
Andrew Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 21 lines which said:
If this is the source of the conflict, then BOTH experiments should
not use the v=spf1 records.
It is an absolutely incredible request since SPF uses these records
since its beginning (a long time before Sender-ID existed) and since
there is (unlike SenderID) actual deployment, which can not be called
back.
Is this appeal about avoiding further conflict or is it about
challenging past differences?
-andy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
