On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:41:53 EDT, shogunx said: > > > How about a city in the US which agrees to not engage in such > > behavior, and has an international airport, and several private airports? > > The cities aren't given a choice in the matter - some bright bulb in the > federal bureaucracy decided that fingerprinting airline travelers made sense, > totally overlooking the fact that the terrorists aren't so stupid they can't > catch a flight to Montreal, Ottowa, or Vancouver and rent a car.....
And if we bring suit against this obvious invasion of privacy, citing detriment to our local tourism based economy, due to a lower rate of international visitors, combined with a media campaign exposing the corruption that brought all of this about in the first place? Oh, wait, the former is already taking place. > > Or just *walk* across the border, for that matter... > sleekfreak pirate broadcast http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
