listening in on this conversation, it seems to me that Marshall is talking
about "conferencing" in a sense which includes a lot of different
mechanisms, the premier one being instant messaging, while Jon (and the
XCON charter) speaks about "conferencing" in a sense that starts out
assuming that voice is included, and that video is the logical next step,
while conferencing based on IM, if thought of at all, is regarded as a
small side issue.
I don't know how to add markers to the charter to make it obvious how the
word "conferencing" is intended here, however. And it may not even make the
issue go away.
And, of course, I may have misunderstood the charter (or Marshall).
Harald
- Re: WG Review: Centraliz... David Morris
- Re: WG Review: Centraliz... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: WG Review: Centraliz... Rohan Mahy
- Re: WG Review: Centraliz... Marshall Rose
- Re: WG Review: Centralized C... Marshall Rose
- Re: WG Review: Centraliz... Alan Johnston
- Re: WG Review: Centraliz... Rohan Mahy
- Re: WG Review: Centraliz... Keith Moore
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon) Peterson, Jon
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon) Peterson, Jon
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (... Ari Ollikainen
- Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon... Dave Crocker
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon) Adam Roach
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon) Adam Roach
- Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon) Adam Roach
- Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon) Adam Roach
- Re: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon... Marshall Rose
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon) Adam Roach
- RE: WG Review: Centralized Conferencing (xcon) Adam Roach
