Keith Moore wrote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:31:23 -0500
John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Besides, we have three such prefixes, given RFC-1918 and 6to4:
2002:A00::/24, 2002:AC10::/28, and 2002:C0A8::/32.
the same problems exist for these as for SLs.
Right.
we should deprecate these
also when we revise 6to4.
Perhaps; but, given the prevalence of RFC-1918 addresses, it's unlikely
that anybody's going to build their 6to4 implementation to block it from
using them.
--
/============================================================\
|John Stracke |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com |
|Centive |My opinions are my own. |
|============================================================|
|"God does not play games with His loyal servants." "Whoo-ee,|
|where have you *been*?" --_Good Omens_ |
\============================================================/
