> Counting RFCs looks like it's bad the same way that pure LOC counts > are bad.
err, okay, i guess. however, it may be useful for folks to actually read the draft before making comments... thus far, i've only seen two folks with comments who claim to have actually read the thing. as an author of the draft, i don't think "Counting RFCs" was a goal, or even something we explicitly did... /mtr
