Perry Metzger writes:
| Ah, but then what's your method for mapping between the two, and how
| fast must *it* run and how well does *it* scale?
...
| I'm not saying such a thing doesn't exist. I'm just saying that I
| haven't seen a worked example I can believe in.
Stay tuned to multi6.
We are in the process of describing the requirements and the way
IPv4 site multihoming works today precisely enough that the various
proposals that have been mooted can be adapted to support some
superset (ideally a proper one, if possible) of those.
Please feel free to try to make sure your excellent questions and
concerns are reflected in the requirements document. The draft
authors/editors are happy with input, and of course so are the WG chairs.
If the reqs document ends up providing a means of determining
whether a given proposal is something you can believe in,
everyone in this standards organization should be very happy.
Sean.
