John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [Randomly selected moderators.] > Then you have to educate the subscribers on how to approve messages. Include a short explanation in the message of why it is sent, and offer to follow a URL to approve the message. One of the randomly choosen subscribers presumably knows how to follow a link. -- Stanislav Shalunov http://www.internet2.edu/~shalunov/ This message is designed to be viewed at 600 mph.
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs John Kristoff
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Kevin Farley
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs ned . freed
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Tony Hain
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Maurizio Codogno
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs John Stracke
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs stanislav shalunov
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Vernon Schryver
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Maurizio Codogno
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Vernon Schryver
- focus Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Mak, L (Leen)
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James M Galvin
