yeah, I really wish those who are trying to improve network routing (an endeavor which I respect in principle) would consider that applications really do need stable endpoint identifiers which are globally scoped, exchangable with other applications, and reliably usable from anywhere to reach the process listening to that endpoint. Keith
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Denis Mcmahon
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Harald Alvestrand
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Mike Fisk
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Matt Holdrege
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! V Guruprasad
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sam Liang
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Fred Baker
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Fred Baker
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Fred Baker
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! V Guruprasad
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! V Guruprasad
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! V Guruprasad