> > I fervently hope not. Las Vegas is the tobacco smoking capital of > > the U.S. -- higher rates than anywhere else in the country, including > > areas where they grow the stuff. It is also very hard to find good > > quality food (but is awash in cheap buffets). > > Sorry, but I'd prefer Vegas vs. not being able to attend half of the > meetings I planned to in San Diego simply because there was not enough > space. I was very dishardened by this, and hope the meeting planners are > able to plan for 3000+ attendees for future meetings. for many people, having smoke anywhere near the meeting rooms is as much of a barrier to participation as having the meeting rooms full. I'd far rather we raise the bar for participants (i.e. only admit those who have done their homework) than make more room for non-participants. Keith
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Michael Richardson
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Harald Alvestrand
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Jon Crowcroft
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Daniel Senie
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Michael Richardson
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Randall Gellens
- RE: 49th-IETF conf room planning Matthew Goldman
- RE: 49th-IETF conf room planning Tripp Lilley
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Henning G. Schulzrinne
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Keith Moore
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Michael Mealling
- RE: 49th-IETF conf room planning Matthew Goldman
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Keith Moore
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Michael Mealling
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Jeffrey Altman
- RE: 49th-IETF conf room planning Matthew Goldman
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Keith Moore
- RE: 49th-IETF conf room planning Scott Brim
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning David Meyer
- Re: 49th-IETF conf room planning Keith Moore