[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean Doran) writes:
> I should have waited until Perry had spoken, because now that he has
> pointed out the extreme cost of NAT, I have seen the light!
>
> NATs are expensive. They have gross side-effects. Even Noel Chiappa,
> my guru, says that they are an architectural hack.
>
> So, why are people deploying them?
>
> They are so awful, that it must only happen when people have NO OTHER OPTION.
>
> So, I have to wonder, why is it that they have no option?
Maybe because I hear from folks like you and others that you're
ideologically opposed to deploying v6 instead of against it for
technical reasons?
--
Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Ask not what your country can force other people to do for you..."
