Title: RE: Need to preserve Internet Drafts

All,

Please take Vivek Kapil off of your mailing list. He keeps receiving a large amount of e-mails that he can no longer keep up with.

Thank,

Kathy Wisenbaker
IDC/ASP Strategic Business Consulting
> *Phone : (972) 684-8232, ESN 444-8232
> *  Fax:      (972) 685-3866, ESN 445-3145
> *Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need to preserve Internet Drafts


% Bill Manning wrote:
%       [..from boilerplate..]
% > Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and
% > may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time.
%
%       [..comment...]
% > What constitutes "validity"?
%
% I would suggest only "possibly of current interest to an IETF WG".
%
% cheers,
% gja

        And if it becomes of "current interest to an IETF WG" after the
        six month window?  Or if it is of interest to a non IETF WG, e.g.
        a legally oriented person doing IPR work? Can the IETF make
        "non-valid" collections of drafts available for prior art searches
        as an IETF function, esp. given the language in the boilerplate?
       
--bill

Reply via email to