Re: An Internet Draft as reference material

[Joe Touch]

Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> 
> > PS - is no one else alarmed by the re-publishing of material
> > submitted under an explicit agreement for 'removal after 6 mos'?
> 
> Yes. More generally the presumption that RFC doesn't mean "Request for
> Comments" and that the explicit withdrawal of the preliminary form has
> been over-ridden by a claim for third-party archival persistence.

Interesting that anyone thinks that such claims can 
be retroactively overridden.

Joe