Nikki Cranley wrote:
> I have been reading the RFC's relating to IPv6 for some insight
> to the replacement for the ipv4 TOS field.
It would not be surprising if there were no replacement; TOS
turns out to be problematic. It's the usual problem with
unauthenticated priority fields: the network element processing a
packet has no particular reason to believe the sender's
assessment of the packet's priority.
--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp. |Help stamp out vi in our lifetime! |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| |
\==============================================================/
