[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean Doran) writes: > Therefore, IPv6 is wonderful because it allows for a full-fledged > V-Chip Connectivity Policy, thanks to the difference between > the way it handles multihoming from classical IPv4. Sigh. There once again appears to be a major misrepresentation about what is *required* by IPv6 versus what is *one* of *multiple* possible approaches to a particular issue. So, once again, it appears necessary to point out that approaches that work fine in IPv4 work just as well in IPv6. But IPv6 also enables new approaches as well, some of which are not really practical in IPv4. Thomas
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Eric Brunner
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Brian E Carpenter
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Mike Truskowski
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Andy Fletcher
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Brian E Carpenter
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Anthony Atkielski
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Thomas Narten
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion James Corning
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Vernon Schryver
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Greg Skinner
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Conformance Testing of MGCP, SIP etc Yixin Zhu
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Keith Moore
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran