Greg Skinner wrote: ... > Leaving aside my opinions on how technically sound the idea is, there > is certainly precedent for restricting certain types of domain name or > IP address space. Members of the commission are certainly aware of > this. If they can get enough support for their proposals, and enough > of the Internet community goes along with them, they can pull it off, > in my opinion. > > --gregbo Sorry, this makes no sense at all. There is no way to "restrict" certain types of domain name that has any meaningful effect, given the absence of international jurisdiction, and IP addresses relate to network topology not to content, so they can't be used in this way, whatever misapprehensions some of the commission members may be under. Brian
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion vinton g. cerf
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Greg Skinner
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion vinton g. cerf
- Any surprize at all? (was Re: more on IPv6 ... R. A. Hettinga
- Control by consent (Was Re: Any surpriz... Andy Fletcher
- Re: Control by consent (Was Re: An... vinton g. cerf
- Re: Control by consent (Was Re: An... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Fred Baker
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Brian E Carpenter
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Greg Skinner
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Brian E Carpenter
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion John Day
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhausti... James Corning
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Anthony Atkielski
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Matt Crawford
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Bill Manning
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion R. A. Hettinga
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Rick H Wesson
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Anthony Atkielski
