On Thu, 03 Aug 2000 12:57:49 EDT, "Book, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Vinton's idea has much merit. A scheme to allocate blocks of addresses to
> manufacturers would be much easier to support than an organization
> attempting to process individual email requests, or CGI scripted forms from
> a webpage, or a world-wide DHCP server for Amana ( and one for Maytag, etc.)
> to register a refrigerator. And easier administration should translate into
You don't want to assign network addresses on a per-manufacturer basis.
Network addresses have to be aggregable.
That's why we have ARP because MAC addresses on an Ehternet are assigned
per manufacturer. But that's OK, because IPv6 has ARP ;)
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Bob Hinden
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rick H Wesson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Steve Deering
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Book, Robert
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! John Stracke
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! John Day
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! vinton g. cerf
- Address allocation revisited Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Address allocation revisited Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Address allocation revisited Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Address allocation revisited Robert Elz
- Re: Address allocation revisited John Day
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Jim_Stephenson-Dunn
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dennis Glatting
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Mahadevan Iyer
PGP signature