On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:33:50 +0200, Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > It's like radio: Some people are content to tune in to their favorite FM > station and listen to the Top 40 or "easy listening" music; whereas others > prefer to get ham radio licenses and explore the medium to its fullest. Interesting analogy.. > As long as there are still ways to get the "raw" connections that I prefer, > I don't really care if most people are satisfied with AOL and its > clones--that's their choice. Well.. obviously you're not a ham operator - most of the ones I know are quite zealous about complaining when another operator does anything out of spec.. ;) It's interesting that the major complaint from the non-AOL crowd isn't about AOL's existence, it's about interoperability problems. Quite similar to the average ham operator.... -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- precedence field and mailing lists Keith Moore
- AOL and standards Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- AOL's view of the Net versus the rest Anthony Atkielski
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.t... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Eli Sanchez
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt John Stracke