Randy; > > My intention is to provide a semi permanent definition as an Informational > > RFC. > > > > It is important to make the definition protected by bogus opinions > > of various bodies including IETF. > > of course you will exuse the providers if we continue to be perverse and > find new business models. Exuse? If you mean execution or decapitalization, yes, I will. Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-na... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-na... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-na... Masataka Ohta
- RE: draft-ietf-na... Brijesh Kumar
- Re: draft-ietf-na... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: draft-ietf-na... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-na... Randy Bush
- RE: draft-ietf-na... mark.paton
- RE: draft-ietf-na... Randy Bush
- Re: draft-ietf-na... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-na... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-compli... Eliot Lear
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicati... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Leonid Yegoshin
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Sean Doran
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Sean Doran
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicati... Thomas Narten
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicati... Tim Salo
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicati... Jon Crowcroft