> but that by "on the internet" i >think we mean having unincumbered availability of the common application >protocols, email, http, ftp, ssh, ... I'd go farther than that. Internet access includes only only the ability to use the common protocols, but also the uncommon ones - indeed, any protocol that works over IP. some folks tend to think that as long as the popular protocols (as measured by counts of packets with certain port numbers) are handled this is good enough. there are at least two fallacies here - (1) it assumes that the Internet is static and that no new protocols need be accomodated and (2) it assumes that there is a relationship between the amount of bandwidth used by a protocol and the importance of that protocol. IMHO, one of the most important features of the Internet is its flexibility, and in particular, its ability to handle arbitrary protocols as long as they can run over IP. Keith
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Taylor, Johnny
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Taylor, Johnny
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Taylor, Johnny
- Re: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Lars-Erik Jonsson
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Ashutosh Agarwal
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Ashutosh Agarwal
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Patrik Fältström
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Randy Bush
- Re: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Keith Moore
- Re: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Jon Crowcroft
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? TSIGARIDAS PANAGIOTIS
- Re: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Doug Royer
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Stewart Nolan
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Steven Cotton
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Dawson, Peter D
- Re: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Jon Crowcroft
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Vernon Schryver
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Rick H Wesson
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet?? Vernon Schryver