> The bottom line is that although the bill has some unsavory aspects (hey, > this is politics, dontcha know), it is well intended, and restoral of the > banner notification could be a serious tool in the fight against junk > email. sure, but there's no way the DMA is going to let that happen. they'll water down the bill (as they have done) to make it almost completely ineffective at stopping spam. their idea is to raise the bar for spam just enough that maybe the porn merchants can't use it but folks trying to sell you soap or cars or whatever can use it. and the folks who supported the compromise (in the name of trying to get *some* bill passed) end up having to support a bill that actually makes the situation worse. Keith
- fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail Lillian Komlossy
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting S... Doug Isenberg
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiti... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Li... Chip Rosenthal
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bi... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bi... Mark Atwood
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passe... James Wilson
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Li... Fred Baker
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bi... Mike Truskowski
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bi... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passe... Matt Crawford
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Kurt Weber
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Dan Kohn
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Eric Brunner
