John C Klensin wrote: > > --On Friday, June 02, 2000 10:56 AM -0700 Joe Touch > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The use of the trailing dot (www.netscape.com.) remains > > a useful way to force the resolver to avoid suffix extensions. > > And a useful way to induce massive confusion, since many > applications do not recognize the hack and won't pass it to a > resolver (which, of course, may or may not recognize it either). It's not a hack - it's a fully qualified domain name. Wouldn't this be a fine way to flag the bug in those apps? Joe
- RE: Cite on DNS-related traffic. Daryl Bunce
- Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic. Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic. Garreth Jeremiah
- Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic. Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic. Joe Touch
- Re: Cite on DNS-related traf... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Security and suffixes (Re: C... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Security and suffixe... Joe Touch
- Re: Security and suffixe... Keith Moore
- Re: Security and suffixe... John C Klensin
- Re: Cite on DNS-related ... Joe Touch
- Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic. Garrett Wollman
- Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic. Garrett Wollman
- RE: Cite on DNS-related traffic. Rick H Wesson
