In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Manning writes: > >Sigh, > Please -NOT- the PIARA again. There is near zero value in the >number/address Right. That's why, following the publication of RFC 1631, everyone gave up on NATs as a bad idea, and no one is selling them. We all have all the addresses we want, so why bother translating? --Steve Bellovin
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Tripp Lilley
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Paul Robinson
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Jon Crowcroft
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? vinton g. cerf
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Sean Doran
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Bill Manning
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? David R. Conrad
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Bill Manning
- PIARA (IP address space economics) Sean Doran
- Re: PIARA (IP address space economics) Masataka Ohta
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Jim Stephenson-Dunn
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? vinton g. cerf
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Greg Skinner
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Greg Skinner
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? David R. Conrad
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Yakov Rekhter
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? J. Noel Chiappa
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Jim Stephenson-Dunn