> no class action perhaps that's not the appropriate mechanism, or perhaps that remedy isn't available to a large number of those affected. but sooner or later folks are going to be held liable for poor engineering or poor implementation of networking software, just like folks today can be held liable for poor engineering or implementation of bridges or buildings. when people who design such programs know about these risks, are aware of adequate countermeasures (e.g. don't make executable content "clickable", or execute it only in a sandbox), and yet take no action to ameliorate the risks... how far is that from negligence? Keith
- viruses on UNIX vs. Windows Keith Moore
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Keith Moore
- THe Value Of Following Standards... (was Re: VIRUS WAR... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: THe Value Of Following Standards... (was Re: ... Magnus Danielson
- Re: THe Value Of Following Standards... (was Re: ... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: THe Value Of Following Standards... (was ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: THe Value Of Following Standards... (was Re: ... Keith Moore
- Re: VIRUS WARNING A James Lewis
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Jon Crowcroft
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Keith Moore
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Jacob Palme
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Keith Moore
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Jacob Palme
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Tim Salo
- Re: VIRUS WARNING & music at... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: music at pittsburgh? Tripp Lilley
- Re: music at pittsburgh? Bob Welsh
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Keith Moore
- Re: VIRUS WARNING Magnus Danielson