At 09:45 PM 4/24/00 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > I agree! Why create a finite anything when an infinite > > possibility exists? > >Exactly. If you designed an open-ended protocol, you're far less likely to >ever have to rewrite it. You just have to redeploy new implementations when you add new features. "Open-ended" isn't helping us in extending DHCP. That's not to say a practical, extensible, open-ended protocol can't be written... - Ralph
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? David A Higginbotham
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Peter Johansson
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Dick St.Peters
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Ralph Droms
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Joe Touch
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Manish R. Shah.
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeate... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeate... John Stracke
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Ian King